Stephen Colbert for President: A Comedy of Political Possibilities

The idea of Late Show host Stephen Colbert entering the political arena as a presidential candidate has captured the imagination of many Americans seeking an alternative to the current political landscape. While the concept may seem far-fetched, it raises fascinating questions about celebrity candidacy, political experience, and what voters truly want from their leaders.

The Central Question: Would He Actually Do It?

The most pressing question surrounding a hypothetical Colbert presidential campaign isn’t whether he could win, but whether he would even consider running. Colbert has built his career on sharp political commentary and satirical takes on the very political process he would need to enter. His honorable character and decades spent as the observer rather than the observed suggest he might be reluctant to subject himself to the intense scrutiny and personal attacks that define modern presidential campaigns.

The transition from satirist to candidate would require Colbert to fundamentally alter his relationship with politics—moving from the comfortable position of critic to the vulnerable role of participant. For someone who has mastered the art of political commentary, the prospect of becoming the target rather than the source of such commentary presents a significant psychological hurdle.

Starting Smaller: A South Carolina Strategy

A more realistic political path for Colbert might involve returning to his home state of South Carolina to run for governor or senator. This approach would allow him to gain governing experience while working within a political system he understands intimately. However, South Carolina’s conservative political landscape presents its own challenges for a comedian known for his liberal-leaning commentary.

The state’s political culture might prove resistant to Colbert’s brand of humor and progressive viewpoints, making even a statewide campaign an uphill battle. Nevertheless, such a race could serve as a proving ground for his political viability and help establish his credentials beyond entertainment.

The Anti-MAGA Appeal

Should Colbert decide to pursue higher office, he would likely position himself as a compelling alternative to the populist nationalism that has dominated recent political discourse. His intellectual approach to politics, combined with his ability to communicate complex ideas through humor, could resonate with center-left voters seeking authentic leadership.

Comparisons to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky are inevitable—both are entertainers who transitioned to politics during turbulent times. Zelensky’s success in rallying his nation suggests that the right celebrity candidate, under the right circumstances, can transcend their entertainment background to become an effective leader.

The Celebrity Politician Dilemma

The elephant in the room remains America’s complicated relationship with celebrity politicians. The mixed results of electing leaders without traditional governing experience have left many voters wary of putting another entertainer in the Oval Office, regardless of their qualifications or character.

This skepticism represents a significant obstacle for any celebrity candidate, even one as thoughtful and politically engaged as Colbert. Voters may appreciate his intelligence and humor but question whether those qualities translate into effective governance.

A Dream Deferred?

Perhaps the most honest assessment is that a Colbert presidential campaign represents the kind of political fantasy that works better in theory than in practice. While his wit, intelligence, and moral compass make him an appealing hypothetical candidate, the realities of modern American politics might be better served by keeping him in his current role as commentator and truth-teller.

Sometimes the most valuable public servants are those who hold power accountable rather than seek to wield it themselves. In an era of political divisiveness and institutional distrust, America might benefit more from Colbert’s continued presence behind the Late Show desk than behind the Resolute Desk.

The question of Stephen Colbert’s political future ultimately reflects our broader uncertainties about leadership, experience, and what we truly want from our elected officials. While the dream of a Colbert presidency may remain just that—a dream—it serves as a useful thought experiment about the kind of leaders we need and the paths they might take to serve their country.

‘To Schlapp’ #COVID19 #Pandemic #CoronaVirus

A new verb?
Shelton Bumgarner

by Shelt Garner
@sheltgarner


As any student of history will tell you — the writer’s have a wicked sense of humor. In fact, I would say whomever is writing human history definitely likes irony. Before I go any further, let me stress that while I hate MAGA’s idology with a white hot fucking rage, I have nothing personal against any of them. I don’t want any physical harm to come to any of them, though I would squeal with glee if Trump spent the rest of his life in prison.

So, imagine how my eyebrows rose when I heard that the Dear Leader’s favorite cock holster Matt Schlapp not only hung out with some dude who went to CPAC with COVID19, he shook POTUS’ hand at some point later. I would go so far that if we could somehow prove that any potential COVID19 infection of POTUS came from that contact that we might have a new verb in the English language: “to schlapp.”

When you schlapp, you harm the thing you love the most.

I really don’t want any physical harm to come to Trump, or Schlapp, for that matter. Trump is doing his best to destroy himself all on his own without me hoping for any physical harm against him. Live long and prosper, Trump…in prison.

But, as I have said repeatedly, nothing as of right now gives me any indication that after all is said and done, Trump will still in be in power being a tyrant. And even if he somehow does leave office, his replacement will be someone equal (Pence) or worse (Rep. Steve King.)

Though, if really wanted to get surreal and dark, you might say if we start to have any continuation of government issues — which I definitely don’t want — that we may endup with a President Ivanka.

Ugh.

Um, POTUS Is Under Active Personal Investigation For Obstruction….Now What?

by Shelton Bumgarner
@bumgarls

Happy birthday, Mr. President, you’re under investigation for obstruction of justice!

I’m not really outrage over all of this, I’m more bemused by the odd silence on the part of right wing nutjobs who told me it would be end times if Hillary Clinton became president because she would inevitably be under personal investigation.

Well, guess what!

This is an example of how Trump and all his insane rhetoric is tearing civil society apart. It’s not like all the people who I’ve alienated because of my absolute desire to defeat Trump in 2016 are going to, like, start being my friend again.

The damage is done. There’s no going back, at least for the time being.

So, I can talk about engaging people all I want, but in real terms nothing is going to happen. Nothing of any substance is going to change. Even if Trump is impeached and convicted, the people who were conned by him won’t come back and try to break bread with me.

That ship sailed a long, long time ago.

We’re just going to have to deal with the consquences.