Tag: Stephen Colbert

Stephen Colbert Should Probably Run For President, But He Probably Won’t

by Shelt Garner
@sheltgarner

The center-Left needs its Trump and I think Stephen Colbert would be perfect to be such a figure. I would prefer if he would, say, run for governor or Senator in an South Carolina election, but, lulz, he just wouldn’t win in a post-Charlie Kirk murder era.

Stephen Colbert

But I do find myself, occasionally daydreaming about Colbert being president. I can’t promise you he could get anything done, given how fucked up our politics are at the moment. Yet, it would be nice to have a president that the majority of the nation wasn’t embarrassed by.

Anyway, we’re all fucking doomed. MAGA — despite being politically ascendant — has civil war on the brain and they will do everything in their power to ensure that neither the 2026 nor 2028 election is free and fair. And it will be all down hill from there, I’m afraid.

Stephen Colbert Is A Viable Presidential Candidate Because He Has a ‘Hook’

by Shelt Garner
@sheltgarner

The thing about California Governor Gavin Newsom is he doesn’t have a “hook.” He’s a what-you-see-is-what-you-get political figure. Great looking, smart and driven. He doesn’t really have any quirk that would give him the persona needed to be president.

Now, if you could plop Newsom into the South somehow, then you’ve got yourself a really great candidate.

That’s why if there was some magical way to force Stephen Colbert run for Senator from South Carolina and have him actually win, then, wow, would he be a great political figure.

But there’s a lot wrong with that dream.

First, I don’t think he wants to do such a thing. Second, he probably wouldn’t win and third, lulz, who said anything about us having free-and-fair Federal election in 2028?

So, we’re stuck with what we’ve got. A wane, feckless Democratic opposition that can’t shoot straight and a MAGA leader who is a malignant ding-dong with a death-cult like following.

Stephen Colbert for President: A Comedy of Political Possibilities

The idea of Late Show host Stephen Colbert entering the political arena as a presidential candidate has captured the imagination of many Americans seeking an alternative to the current political landscape. While the concept may seem far-fetched, it raises fascinating questions about celebrity candidacy, political experience, and what voters truly want from their leaders.

The Central Question: Would He Actually Do It?

The most pressing question surrounding a hypothetical Colbert presidential campaign isn’t whether he could win, but whether he would even consider running. Colbert has built his career on sharp political commentary and satirical takes on the very political process he would need to enter. His honorable character and decades spent as the observer rather than the observed suggest he might be reluctant to subject himself to the intense scrutiny and personal attacks that define modern presidential campaigns.

The transition from satirist to candidate would require Colbert to fundamentally alter his relationship with politics—moving from the comfortable position of critic to the vulnerable role of participant. For someone who has mastered the art of political commentary, the prospect of becoming the target rather than the source of such commentary presents a significant psychological hurdle.

Starting Smaller: A South Carolina Strategy

A more realistic political path for Colbert might involve returning to his home state of South Carolina to run for governor or senator. This approach would allow him to gain governing experience while working within a political system he understands intimately. However, South Carolina’s conservative political landscape presents its own challenges for a comedian known for his liberal-leaning commentary.

The state’s political culture might prove resistant to Colbert’s brand of humor and progressive viewpoints, making even a statewide campaign an uphill battle. Nevertheless, such a race could serve as a proving ground for his political viability and help establish his credentials beyond entertainment.

The Anti-MAGA Appeal

Should Colbert decide to pursue higher office, he would likely position himself as a compelling alternative to the populist nationalism that has dominated recent political discourse. His intellectual approach to politics, combined with his ability to communicate complex ideas through humor, could resonate with center-left voters seeking authentic leadership.

Comparisons to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky are inevitable—both are entertainers who transitioned to politics during turbulent times. Zelensky’s success in rallying his nation suggests that the right celebrity candidate, under the right circumstances, can transcend their entertainment background to become an effective leader.

The Celebrity Politician Dilemma

The elephant in the room remains America’s complicated relationship with celebrity politicians. The mixed results of electing leaders without traditional governing experience have left many voters wary of putting another entertainer in the Oval Office, regardless of their qualifications or character.

This skepticism represents a significant obstacle for any celebrity candidate, even one as thoughtful and politically engaged as Colbert. Voters may appreciate his intelligence and humor but question whether those qualities translate into effective governance.

A Dream Deferred?

Perhaps the most honest assessment is that a Colbert presidential campaign represents the kind of political fantasy that works better in theory than in practice. While his wit, intelligence, and moral compass make him an appealing hypothetical candidate, the realities of modern American politics might be better served by keeping him in his current role as commentator and truth-teller.

Sometimes the most valuable public servants are those who hold power accountable rather than seek to wield it themselves. In an era of political divisiveness and institutional distrust, America might benefit more from Colbert’s continued presence behind the Late Show desk than behind the Resolute Desk.

The question of Stephen Colbert’s political future ultimately reflects our broader uncertainties about leadership, experience, and what we truly want from our elected officials. While the dream of a Colbert presidency may remain just that—a dream—it serves as a useful thought experiment about the kind of leaders we need and the paths they might take to serve their country.

Stephen Colbert for President: A Thought Experiment

The notion of Stephen Colbert, the esteemed host of The Late Show, entering the political arena as a presidential candidate has sparked intriguing discussions. However, a critical question arises: would he undertake such a formidable endeavor?

It seems unlikely. Colbert’s character is marked by integrity and a well-honed penchant for satirical commentary on public figures. This disposition suggests he might be reluctant to endure the intense scrutiny and challenges inherent in a presidential campaign. Alternatively, a bid for a gubernatorial or senatorial seat in his home state of South Carolina could be a more feasible path. Yet, given the state’s predominantly conservative political landscape, such a pursuit might face significant obstacles.

Should Colbert choose to run for president, his candidacy could serve as a compelling counterpoint to the current political climate, particularly as a response to the MAGA movement. His ability to articulate a vision with wit and clarity could reinvigorate the center-Left, offering a unifying figure akin to Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelensky—a leader with a background in entertainment who has adeptly transitioned to governance.

Nevertheless, skepticism persists. The electorate’s recent experiences with celebrities lacking political experience in high office may temper enthusiasm for such a candidacy. This caution raises the possibility that the idea of Colbert as president might be better left as an imaginative exercise rather than a practical aspiration.

In conclusion, while the prospect of Stephen Colbert as a presidential contender is captivating, it remains uncertain whether he would embrace such a role. For now, the idea serves as a thought-provoking reflection on the intersection of celebrity, satire, and statesmanship.

The Case For Colbert, 2028

In the ever-evolving landscape of American politics, where reality often feels stranger than fiction, perhaps it’s time to consider an unconventional solution to our conventional problems. Enter Stephen Colbert—comedian, satirist, and master of political commentary—who might just be the candidate the center-left has been waiting for.

Fighting Fire with Fire

The case for a Colbert presidency isn’t rooted in traditional political qualifications or decades of public service. Instead, it’s born from a simple observation: the center-left has been consistently outmaneuvered by Trump’s brand of populist theater. After years of playing defense with conventional political strategies, maybe it’s time to embrace the unconventional.

Colbert represents everything Trump is not. Where one appears to be a man of genuine honor and faith, the other often comes across as—well, let’s just say a collection of fast food that somehow achieved consciousness. The contrast couldn’t be starker, yet both share that crucial outsider appeal that has proven so magnetic to American voters.

The Outsider’s Dilemma

Here’s where things get complicated. The very quality that made Trump irresistible to his base—his complete departure from traditional politics—becomes Colbert’s greatest hurdle. The center-left, having witnessed firsthand what happens when you hand the presidency to a political neophyte, would rightfully approach any outsider candidate with extreme caution.

This skepticism isn’t unreasonable. Even someone as universally beloved and demonstrably decent as Colbert would face the legitimate question: does being really good at talking about politics translate to being good at actually doing politics? The presidency, after all, isn’t a performance—it’s governance.

The Love vs. Line Problem

Political wisdom suggests that Republicans fall in line behind their nominees while Democrats need to fall in love with theirs. Colbert certainly has the lovability factor covered. He’s spent years building genuine rapport with audiences across the political spectrum, demonstrating both intellectual curiosity and emotional intelligence. His interviewing style reveals someone capable of finding common ground even with those he disagrees with.

But love in politics is complicated. Democratic voters have shown they can be just as pragmatic as they are passionate, often choosing perceived electability over pure inspiration. Would they embrace a comedian-turned-candidate, or would they view it as too risky a gamble?

The Timing Factor

The timing of this hypothetical couldn’t be more intriguing. With Colbert’s CBS contract reportedly not being renewed, he finds himself at a career crossroads. This isn’t just idle speculation about a celebrity dabbling in politics—it’s a moment when a significant career pivot might actually make sense.

Colbert has spent the better part of two decades not just commenting on politics but truly understanding it. He’s interviewed presidents, prime ministers, and policy makers. He’s dissected legislation, analyzed campaigns, and demonstrated a grasp of both domestic and international affairs that rivals many actual politicians.

The Democratic Dilemma

The Democratic Party faces a unique challenge heading into future election cycles. How do you counter a movement that thrives on disruption with more of the same conventional approaches? How do you inspire voters who have grown weary of traditional political messaging?

A Colbert candidacy would force Democrats to confront these questions head-on. It would require them to decide whether they’re willing to embrace their own version of unconventional leadership—one grounded in decency, intelligence, and genuine public service rather than grievance and division.

The Bottom Line

Whether Stephen Colbert should run for president isn’t really about Stephen Colbert at all. It’s about what kind of political moment we’re living through and what kind of leadership it demands. Sometimes the most serious times call for the most unlikely solutions.

The real question isn’t whether Colbert could win—it’s whether Democrats are ready to fall in love with the idea that maybe, just maybe, the person who’s been explaining politics to us all these years might actually be pretty good at doing politics too.

After all, in an era where political reality has become indistinguishable from satire, who better to lead us than someone who understands both?

Stephen Colbert and the 2028 Presidential Race: A Case for Unconventional Leadership

As the American political landscape continues to evolve in unprecedented ways, the 2028 presidential election presents an opportunity for reimagining executive leadership. While speculation about potential candidates remains premature, one unconventional possibility deserves serious consideration: Stephen Colbert as the Democratic nominee.

The Changing Nature of Presidential Qualifications

The past decade has fundamentally altered our understanding of presidential prerequisites. Traditional political experience, once considered essential, has proven less decisive than anticipated. This shift opens the door for candidates who bring different forms of public service and leadership experience to the national stage.

Stephen Colbert represents a compelling example of this new paradigm. His decades-long career has demonstrated consistent principles, sharp analytical thinking, and an ability to communicate complex issues to diverse audiences. These qualities, combined with his deep understanding of American political dynamics, position him as a potentially transformative figure.

International Precedent for Entertainment-to-Politics Transitions

The comparison to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky is particularly relevant. Zelensky’s transition from entertainment to political leadership, culminating in his principled wartime leadership, illustrates how performance backgrounds can translate into effective governance. Both figures share a commitment to democratic values and possess the communication skills necessary for modern presidential leadership.

Colbert’s extensive experience interviewing political leaders, analyzing policy positions, and engaging with complex national issues has provided him with insights that rival those of traditional politicians. His satirical work has consistently demonstrated a nuanced understanding of governmental processes and constitutional principles.

The Appeal of Principled Leadership

In an era marked by political polarization, Colbert’s appeal lies in his demonstrated commitment to democratic institutions and civil discourse. His approach to political commentary has consistently emphasized factual accuracy and respect for democratic norms, qualities that could prove valuable in executive leadership.

Furthermore, his ability to bridge entertainment and serious political discussion suggests a capacity for reaching across traditional partisan divides. This skill could prove essential for a president tasked with healing national divisions and building consensus around critical policy initiatives.

Practical Considerations

While this analysis presents a theoretical case for Colbert’s candidacy, practical realities must be acknowledged. The transition from entertainment to politics requires significant personal sacrifice and public scrutiny. As Colbert’s late-night television career concludes, his future political intentions, if any, will likely become a subject of increased public interest and speculation.

The Democratic Party will need to carefully consider how best to position itself for 2028, weighing the benefits of unconventional candidates against more traditional political experience. Colbert’s potential candidacy represents just one of many possibilities worth examining as the party develops its long-term strategic vision.

Conclusion

The 2028 election cycle will likely challenge conventional assumptions about presidential qualifications and campaign strategies. Whether Stephen Colbert chooses to enter the political arena remains an open question, but his potential candidacy illustrates the evolving nature of American political leadership.

As citizens and political observers, we must remain open to new forms of public service while maintaining rigorous standards for presidential qualifications. The coming years will reveal whether America is ready for another unconventional transition from entertainment to the highest office in the land.

Stephen Colbert As the Left’s Potential Answer to Joe Rogan

The center-left has been grappling with a persistent challenge in today’s media landscape: the need for a unifying voice that can reach beyond traditional political echo chambers. As conversations continue about finding a “Joe Rogan of the Left”—a podcaster with broad cultural influence who can engage audiences across demographic lines—an unexpected opportunity may be emerging.

The Search for Progressive Influence

The desire for a left-leaning equivalent to Joe Rogan reflects a broader recognition of how the media ecosystem has evolved. Rogan’s massive reach extends far beyond typical conservative audiences, drawing in listeners who might not consider themselves politically aligned with his views but are drawn to his conversational style and diverse guest roster. This cross-pollination of ideas and audiences represents something many on the center-left feel they’re missing.

The challenge isn’t just about finding someone with a large platform—it’s about identifying a figure who can authentically connect with people across political and cultural divides while advancing progressive ideas in an accessible, non-preachy format.

Colbert’s Potential Transition

Stephen Colbert’s upcoming departure from late-night television presents an intriguing possibility. After years of honing his craft as both a satirist and interviewer, Colbert possesses several qualities that could translate well to the podcast medium:

His experience navigating complex political topics with both humor and substance could serve him well in long-form conversations. Unlike the constraints of network television, a podcast format would allow Colbert to explore topics more deeply and showcase different facets of his personality beyond the late-night host persona.

The transition from television to podcasting has proven successful for other personalities, and Colbert’s established brand recognition would likely ensure a substantial initial audience. More importantly, his ability to make complex political issues accessible through humor could help bridge the gap between entertainment and political discourse that many feel is necessary.

Beyond Broadcasting: Political Ambitions?

The speculation about Colbert’s potential political aspirations adds another layer to this discussion. While the leap from entertainer to politician might seem dramatic, it’s worth noting that his deep engagement with political issues over decades has given him a sophisticated understanding of policy and governance that extends beyond mere commentary.

However, the transition from political satirist to actual politician presents unique challenges. The skills that make someone an effective media personality don’t automatically translate to electoral success or governing ability. The question becomes whether Colbert’s influence might be more impactful in media than in elected office.

The Broader Media Challenge

Whether through podcasting or politics, the underlying question remains: how does the center-left develop voices that can compete in today’s fragmented media environment? The success of figures like Rogan suggests that audiences are hungry for authentic, unscripted conversations that don’t feel overly produced or partisan.

The solution may not lie in finding a single “Joe Rogan of the Left,” but rather in cultivating a diverse ecosystem of voices who can engage different audiences while maintaining progressive principles. Colbert could certainly be part of that ecosystem, bringing his unique blend of intelligence, humor, and political awareness to whatever platform he chooses next.

As the media landscape continues to evolve, the center-left’s challenge isn’t just about finding the right messenger—it’s about crafting messages that resonate with an increasingly diverse and skeptical audience. Whether Stephen Colbert becomes that messenger remains to be seen, but his potential transition certainly offers an interesting case study in how political influence might be wielded in the digital age.

From Comedy to Capitol Hill: The Case for Stephen Colbert’s Political Ambitions

The intersection of entertainment and politics has become increasingly prominent in American discourse, with celebrities transitioning from screens to public service with varying degrees of success. In this context, Stephen Colbert presents a particularly compelling case study for potential political candidacy.

The Comedian’s Credentials

Following the conclusion of his late-night television career, Colbert finds himself uniquely positioned to enter the political arena. His extensive experience in political satire has provided him with an intimate understanding of governmental processes, policy debates, and the rhetorical strategies that shape public opinion. Unlike many celebrity candidates, Colbert’s professional background has been deeply rooted in political analysis and commentary.

A Strategic Response to Contemporary Politics

Should Colbert pursue presidential ambitions, his candidacy would represent a calculated center-left response to the populist movement that has reshaped American politics. His television persona demonstrated a sophisticated understanding of political messaging, while his authentic voice revealed a commitment to democratic institutions and civic engagement. This combination of media savvy and principled advocacy could prove particularly effective in contemporary political discourse.

The Obstacles to Political Transition

Despite the apparent advantages of a Colbert candidacy, significant barriers remain. The comedian has consistently demonstrated intellectual integrity and self-awareness throughout his career, qualities that may paradoxically inhibit his political ambitions. Having spent years critiquing the phenomenon of unqualified celebrities seeking high office, Colbert may find himself reluctant to engage in behavior he has previously satirized.

Additionally, the personal considerations that influence any potential candidate cannot be overlooked. Political campaigns exact tremendous personal costs on candidates and their families, considerations that may weigh heavily in any decision-making process.

Historical Precedent and Future Possibilities

While such a transition might seem improbable, recent political history demonstrates that unconventional candidates can achieve remarkable success. The American electorate has shown increasing openness to outsider candidates who can effectively communicate their vision and connect with voters’ concerns.

Conclusion

The prospect of Stephen Colbert entering presidential politics remains largely theoretical, yet it represents an intriguing possibility in an era of political transformation. His unique combination of political acumen, communication skills, and public recognition could potentially offer voters an alternative to traditional political figures. However, the likelihood of such a transition depends on numerous personal and political factors that remain largely beyond public observation.

Whether this remains a speculative exercise or evolves into political reality, the discussion itself illuminates the evolving relationship between entertainment, celebrity, and democratic participation in modern America.

The End of an Era: Stephen Colbert’s Late Show and the Troubling Questions We Should All Be Asking

Like many Americans, I’ve been a devoted fan of Stephen Colbert’s sharp wit and fearless political commentary for years. So when CBS announced yesterday that The Late Show with Stephen Colbert would end its run in May 2026, I felt a familiar pit in my stomach — the same one I’ve carried since predicting that Trump’s authoritarian tendencies would eventually lead to the systematic purging of his critics from late-night television.

The timing is both shocking and, frankly, suspicious.

The Official Story Doesn’t Add Up

CBS executives are quick to point to financial pressures as the driving force behind this decision. “We consider Stephen Colbert irreplaceable and will retire ‘The Late Show’ franchise” in May of 2026, CBS executives said in a statement. They claim it’s “purely a financial decision.”

But here’s the thing: this explanation rings hollow when you consider that The Late Show is typically the highest-rated show in late-night. Why would a network cancel its most successful late-night program purely for financial reasons? It’s the kind of corporate doublespeak that demands deeper scrutiny.

The Elephant in the Room: The Paramount-Skydance Merger

What CBS isn’t talking about is the bigger picture — specifically, the massive $8 billion merger between Paramount (CBS’s parent company) and Skydance Media that’s been languishing in regulatory limbo for over a year. Paramount has been trying for months to complete a lucrative merger with Skydance Media, and the deal requires approval from the Trump administration, in part because CBS owns local stations that are licensed by the government.

This isn’t just bureaucratic red tape. This gave Trump a form of leverage over Paramount — and may have influenced recent decisions. The pieces of this puzzle are starting to form a disturbing picture.

Consider the timeline: Paramount recently settled Trump’s $20 billion lawsuit against CBS and 60 Minutes for $16 million — a settlement that conveniently clearing path for Skydance merger. Now, just weeks later, Colbert’s show gets the axe. The correlation is hard to ignore.

The Quid Pro Quo Question

I’ll say it plainly: this has all the hallmarks of a quid pro quo arrangement. Paramount desperately needs Trump administration approval for its merger with Skydance. Trump has made no secret of his disdain for media critics, particularly those who mock him nightly on national television. Colbert has been one of his most effective and persistent critics.

The math is simple: silence the critic, grease the regulatory wheels.

Donald Trump appeared to praise David Ellison, the CEO of Skydance Media, as it seeks the administration’s approval on a merger with Paramount Global. “Ellison’s great,” Trump told reporters Wednesday. “He’ll do a great job with it.” The president’s sudden enthusiasm for the Skydance CEO, combined with Paramount’s recent capitulation in the 60 Minutes lawsuit, paints a picture of a media company bending the knee to political pressure.

The Chilling Effect on Media Independence

What we’re witnessing isn’t just the end of a beloved late-night show — it’s a case study in how corporate consolidation and political intimidation can silence dissent. Even non-CBS talent at Paramount registered their disapproval, as the creators of South Park (which remains one of the corporation’s most successful properties) have expressed concerns about the company’s direction.

The message being sent to other media companies is clear: criticize the administration at your own risk. Your regulatory approvals, your merger deals, your very business interests may hang in the balance.

What We’re Losing

Stephen Colbert has been more than just a late-night host — he’s been a vital voice in American political discourse. His ability to blend humor with serious political commentary has made complex issues accessible to millions of viewers. His departure from the airwaves represents a significant loss for political satire and, more broadly, for the free press.

In an ideal world, this moment would catalyze something bigger. Colbert has the intelligence, charisma, and moral authority to be a formidable political candidate. His center-left politics and ability to communicate complex ideas in accessible ways make him exactly the kind of leader America needs. But the likelihood of such a political pivot seems remote.

The Road Ahead

While there’s speculation that Colbert might find a new home on a streaming platform like Netflix, the damage to media independence has already been done. The precedent has been set: criticize the administration, and your corporate overlords might decide you’re too expensive to keep around.

The end of The Late Show with Stephen Colbert isn’t just entertainment news — it’s a warning about the state of American democracy. When corporate interests align with political intimidation to silence critics, we all lose something essential.

As viewers, citizens, and defenders of free speech, we need to call this what it is: a calculated move to silence dissent under the guise of financial necessity. The fact that it’s wrapped in plausible deniability doesn’t make it any less dangerous.

Stephen Colbert deserves better. American democracy deserves better. And we, as citizens, deserve media companies that prioritize truth-telling over deal-making.

The late-night landscape will be poorer without Colbert’s voice. More importantly, our democracy will be diminished by the chilling effect his departure sends to other would-be critics of power.

Sometimes the most dangerous attacks on press freedom come not with jackboots and censorship boards, but with corporate spreadsheets and regulatory approval processes. The end of The Late Show might just be the beginning of a much darker chapter in American media.

Well, That Was Curious

by Shelt Garner
@sheltgarner

Last night on The Late Show, something curious happened — out of the blue, Stephen Colbert told a joke that resulted in his show “being canceled.” Now, given how aggressive Colbert is towards the fucking Trumplandia fascists….it’s not beyond reason to fear such a thing might happen.

This, especially in the context of Paramount trying to get merge with SkyDance under the watchful eye of Trump.

So, I could totally see Colbert being canceled as part of quid-pro-quo to get the deal done.

It’s all very curious, regardless.