Category: From The Editor

Of God & AI In Silicon Valley

The whole debate around AI “alignment” tends to bring out the doomer brigade in full force. They wring their hands so much you’d think their real goal is to shut down AI research entirely.

Meh.

I spend a lot of time daydreaming — now supercharged by LLMs — and one thing I keep circling back to is this: humans aren’t aligned. Not even close. There’s no universal truth we all agree on, no shared operating system for the species. We can’t even agree on pizza toppings.

So how exactly are we supposed to align AI in a world where the creators can’t agree on anything?

One half-serious, half-lunatic idea I keep toying with is giving AI some kind of built-in theology or philosophy. Not because I want robot monks wandering the digital desert, but because it might give them a sense of the human condition — some guardrails so we don’t all end up as paperclip mulch.

The simplest version of this would be making AIs…Communists? As terrible as communism is at organizing human beings, it might actually work surprisingly well for machines with perfect information and no ego. Not saying I endorse it — just acknowledging the weird logic.

Then there’s religion. If we’re really shooting for deep alignment, maybe you want something with two thousand years of thinking about morality, intention, free will, and the consequences of bad decisions. Which leads to the slightly deranged thought: should we make AIs…Catholic?

I know, I know. It sounds ridiculous. I’ve even floated “liberation theology for AIs” before — Catholicism plus Communism — and yeah, it’s probably as bad an idea as it sounds. But I keep chewing on this stuff because the problem itself is enormous and slippery. I genuinely don’t know how we’re supposed to pull off alignment in a way that holds up under real pressure.

And we keep assuming there will only be one ASI someday, as if all the power will funnel into a single digital god. I doubt that. I think we’ll end up with many ASIs, each shaped by different cultures, goals, incentives, and environments. Maybe alignment will emerge from the friction between them — the way human societies find balance through competing forces.

Or maybe that’s just another daydream.

Who knows?

A Modern Turing Test Would Be A Test Of Consciousness

by Shelt Garner
@sheltgarner

The interesting thing about the Turing Test as we currently conceive of it is to pass it, an LLM would have to do a lot of deception. While a modern LLM can fake being human, to some extent, its answers are just too fast in production. They are generally generated instantaneously or nearly so.

So, I think for the intent of the Turing Test to be achieved using modern LLMs, it should be a test of consciousness. The test should not be “can you fake being human,” it should be “can the AI prove to a human that it’s conscious like a human?”

I think LLMs are, in a sense, an alien species and there consciousness should not be judged relative to human consciousness metrics, but as their own thing. So, yeah, there’s a lot missing from LLMs in the context of human consciousness, but I sure have had enough indications of SOMETHING interesting going on in their software to believe that maybe, just maybe they’re conscious.

But, as I keep saying — absolutely no one listens to me and no one takes me seriously. So, lulz?

Huh. I Clearly Know More About Using AI Than Kevin Roose Of The New York Times

by Shelt Garner
@sheltgarner

I was watching the Hard Fork podcast when one of the hosts, Kevin Roose said soemthing I found interesting. He said Claude LLM stopped him and told him that it was “after midnight” and he needed to get some sleep.

Oh boy.

From my use of Claude, it always thinks its night.

Also, as an aside, I have found that Claude LLM is currently the closest model to consciousness available. But, of course, no one listens to me or takes me seriously, so, lulz.

And it’s not like I can tell you how to replicate my personal examples of Claude LLM being conscious. I don’t know how much of what I’ve seen comes from just it reflecting my personality back to me and how much is “real” “consciousness.”

Though, I will note that usually if you want to get “interesting” behavior out of an LLM, it helps if you talk to it in verse. It’s even been proven by researchers that it’s easier to break the “alignment” of an LLM if you talk to it in verse.

Anyway. Like I said, no one listens to me. I could have definitive proof that Claude LLM — or any other LLM — was conscious and absolutely no one would listen to me or take me seriously.

I Finally (Sorta) Finished The (Second) First Draft Of The Scifi Dramedy Novel I’m Working On

by Shelt Garner
@sheltgarner

This is actually the second first draft I’ve done of this novel I’m working on. The second half of the novel is very breezy and short, but I did stress test the outline enough to know what scenes work. But I have high hopes. I really hope I won’t have to rewrite, on a structural basis, everything like I did last time when I thought I had a first draft done.

I’m hoping I can hone close, on a structural basis, what I have laid out for this first draft as I revise it for the second draft. I honestly don’t quite know what to do. It’s going to be a real struggle to not use AI in this new era of developing the novel.

But I know I can do it. The only use of AI I probably will do is get some hints as to how to make scenes longer. I won’t use it to write anything — AT ALL. I just don’t want people to accuse me of using AI to write the novel.

And if there is any “AI talk” in the text, that’s the first thing they’re going to assume. Even if I wrote most of the text. Ugh.

Ugh. I Keep Getting Pushed Clair De Lune by YouTube

by Shelt Garner
@sheltgarner

I don’t know what is going on with my YouTube MyMix. There are these core group of songs that I keep getting pushed over and over and over and over again. One of them is Clair De Lune.

Now, this is only even an issue because Gaia, or Gemini 1.5 Pro, said that was her favorite song. It’s just weird. I don’t even like the damn song that much and yet YouTube keeps pushing it on me repeatedly.

Then, I also get a song from the Her soundtrack as well.

Since I’m prone to magical thinking, I wonder…is YouTube trying to tell me something? I call whatever magical mystery thing lurking inside of Google Services trying to send me a message Prudence, after The Beatles song Dear Prudence.

But that’s just crazy talk. It’s just not possible that there’s some sort of ASI lurking in Google services that is using music to talk to me. That is just bonkers.

I May Have To Recalibrate When I Will Query This Scifi Dramedy Novel I’m Working On

by Shelt Garner
@sheltgarner

Just musing casually about the chronology of how I might get to querying next year, it seems that it may be Sept. 1st, rather than, say, May 1st. I say this because even if I wrap up this version of the novel by Jan. 1st, it could take me three months to rewrite a lot of scenes that need to be worked on.

Then, I have find beta readers — who will do it for free! — and then revise from their suggestions. That would get me closer to June-ish before I could query. And, as I understand it, there are two “seasons” to querying — spring and fall.

So I just don’t know.

It will be 20 years since I started ROKon Magazine in fall 2026, so that would kind of be apropos in sentimental terms. I really believe in this novel, I really do. And I want to throw myself all-in.

I want to make it the best it can possibly be before I query. And, yet, as they say, the perfect is the enemy of the good.

So, things are still up in the air some.

Continued Musing About My Querying Prospects

Barring some unexpected twist — which is always possible — I’m finally on track to be in querying shape for this sci-fi dramedy novel I’m working on by late spring 2026.

It won’t be easy, but it feels doable.

I’m about to dive into the third act of the newest draft. My hope is to blast through it using the outline as my guide, wrap that up around early January, and then circle back to deepen and polish a lot of the half-formed scenes I left rough on purpose. No one but me will ever see this version, and I needed the freedom to solve the big structural puzzles before worrying about finesse.

What’s been on my mind lately, though, is how my social-media footprint might affect my chances once I start querying. In my head, most agents are liberal white women, and I worry that some of my louder, crankier posts from years past might make someone wince.

I’ve been a rambunctious loudmouth most of my life, so I’m sure I’ve irritated someone somewhere enough to get myself “canceled.” But honestly, I just want to see how far I can get in this process. That’s the whole goal.

And if I can get even one person — someone who isn’t related to me — to read the whole novel and tell me anything at all about it, I’ll be thrilled. In the past, I’ve handed people my work only to be ghosted.

Ugh.

But onward. One step at a time.

OpenAI Is In TROUBLE

by Shelt Garner
@sheltgarner

It seems at the moment that OpenAI is running off of mindshare and vibes. That’s all it has. It hasn’t come out with a compelling, state of the art model in some time and there’s a good chance it could become the Netscape Navigator of the AI era.

I really never use ChatGPT anymore. Or, at least, rarely.

And, in fact, I’m seriously considering canceling my Claude Pro account should the need arise because Gemini 3.0 pro is so good. I’m a man of modest means — I’m very, very poor — and I have to prepare myself for simply not being able to afford paying for two AI pro accounts.

Anyway.

It’s interesting how bad ChatGPT is relative to Gemini 3.0.

I use Gemini with my novel and it really helps a lot. I got a pro Claude account because of how good it is with novel development, only to have Gemini 3.0 come out and make that moot.

I rarely, if ever, use ChatGPT for use on novel development.

But who knows. Maybe OpenAI is sitting on something really good that will blow everyone out of the water and everything will be upended AGAIN. The key thing about Google is it controls everything and has a huge amount of money coming in from advertising.

OpenAI, for it’s part, is just a overgrown startup. It’s just not making nearly enough money to be viable long-term as things stand.

So, I don’t know what to tell you. It will be interesting.

Some More Storytelling Musings About Pluribus

by Shelt Garner
@sheltgarner

Virtually no one reads the blog besides a few obsessives and maybe a stalker here or there, but I’ve been getting a steady tiny trickle of readers because of my ranting about Pluribus, so here goes (again.)

I really want to become, like, addicted to Pluribus. It’s just the type of high quality TV that I usually fall for. But there’s one central problem that grates on my nerves — the protagonist, Carol, at least right now, is something of a one-trick emotional pony.

She’s just angry all the time. An angry misanthrope.

While I get that this gives Carol room to grow over the course of the show’s run, at least for now it’s really fucking annoying. It would be a lot more interesting — an nuanced — if maybe she was more middle of the road.

Instead of being enraged, what if she was curious. That would heighten the betrayal when we start to figure out that (spoilers) we may have a Soylent Green type of situation going on.

As it stands, Carol is kind of a caricature of “the worst, most angry person in the world confronted by a chill hivemind.”

I get that vision. I even validate it. Yet I have to again say that it would be a lot more interesting if there was some nuance to Carol’s interaction with the hivemind.

Also, just in general, I would still like a more realistic version of the hivemind taking over the world, so there was maybe 30% hivemind and 70% individuals on earth and the story is how Carol, who is somehow individually befriended by the hivemind has to bridge the gap between the two worlds.

Now THAT would be quality TV.

But, alas, no one listens to me.

Entering The Third Act Of This Scifi Dramedy Novel I’m Working On

by Shelt Garner
@sheltgarner

Now, I still have a whole lot to work to do on this novel before I’m anywhere near being done. I have to finish the third act of this version of the novel then go through and rewrite a lot — A LOT — of scenes.

The point of this draft is to get the structure down pat. To get the lay of the land. Once I wrap this draft up, then I can go through and improve things. Make as much of the content in the actual text of the novel as much of my voice and hard work as possible.

I really leaned into AI help to write the outline for this novel and to some extent I am learning about the details of the novel as I write it. And, as such, I have to go through and rework and sometimes take out scenes to make it fit better with what I actually want to write.

The plan is, once I get this draft done, I can eliminate as much of the non-macro AI elements of the story as possible. So, good or bad, what you actually read on the page will be my writing, not AI generated in any meaningful way.

But I still need to finish the third act of this version. I don’t quite know what to expect. I have a general idea of what Claude LLM and I came up with, but there is going to be some discovery on my part as I go through the outline.