V-Log: A Deepdive Into FOTUS Affair Events In Late 2017

by Shelton Bumgarner
@bumgarls

I have all but decided that I’ve made a fool out of myself in a very conspicuous manner and that Elliot Broidy is Shera Bechard’s babydaddy and I need to shut up. But my subconscious mind has decided its Donald Trump for some reason, so I keep talking about it.

Let’s get down to the cold hard facts and logic of what’s going on.

What We Know
We know Bechard had an affair with someone between late 2015 and late 2017.
We know that Trump’s schedule and Bechard’s Instagram placed him in proximity (NYC) to Bechard in the mid-to-late September 2017 timeframe.

We know a child was conceived around mid-to-late September of 2017 and later aborted.
We know Trump has, at least once, “raw dogged” with a woman he was having and affair with (Stormy Daniels.)
We have photographic evidence on Instagram that Bechard was at least outward ok with being pregnant at some point.
We know Bechard at one point had a dog named Ellie.

We know Bechard at some point was referred to Keith Davidson.
— Davidson was the lawyer who represented two other women who signed NDAs with Trump.
We know Broidy used Michael Cohen, Trump’s personal lawyer and fixer to represent him.

We know Bechard got $1.6 million (hardly Stormy Daniels’ ‘nuisance” money.)
We know Broidy was actively seeking access to the Trump Adminstration about this time in the guise of various Arab states.

We know that the day after the first installment of the $1.6 million to Bechard, Broidy gained access to Trump directly.
We know Bechard is interested in the #MeToo movement.

What We Don’t Know.
Anything to do with Trump directly being connected to Bechard other than Cohen and Davidson.
Anything to do with Broidy being directly connected to Bechard other than the NDA, Davidson and Cohen.
Anything in cold hard fact terms about Bechard’s exact state of mind at the time of the abortion.
— Was there a direct quid pro quo?
Anything about how many Playboy Bunnies (Playboy itself?) knew anything about an affair with either Broidy or Trump.

In fact, we have no evidence that Broidy even knows Bechard other than the things directly connected to the NDA.

Outstanding questions:
How come $1.6 million from Broidy of all people? He’s a rando. Why would he give a shit. Or why would he give $1.6 million worth of shit.
How could Donald J. Trump bang Bechard while also running for president and being in the Oval Office.
How could all of this be kept secret if Trump was the babydaddy? Is that proof that it didn’t happen?
How did the WSJ learn of the affair? Why did Bechard’s name only come out later in the day once the story broke?

Existential Questions
Why no comment from Peter K. Stris, Bechard’s lawyer?
Why no comment from Cooper Hefner?
Will it even matter if we prove it was Trump? Is there nothing that will ever hurt him politically, especially on the character side. He would not have done anything illegal and he can just keep babbling about the “Criminal Deep State” and “Spygate” while liberals burst into flames over the hypocrisy of a otherwise “pro-life” president.

My FOTUS Affair Cognitive Dissidence Is Severe

by Shelton Bumgarner
@bumgarls

Everything we know points towards Donald J. Trump being Shera Bechard’s babydaddy. Everything we don’t know points to Elliot Broidy. It’s really a struggle at this point to hold on to either theory long enough to say for sure if it’s true or not.

I honestly just want to know one way or another who the babyddy dadday was. That’s it. If it was Broidy, then this is a non-issue and we can go back to being angry at what a bad president Trump is. If it’s Trump, OH MY GOD.

Let’s get down to the cold hard facts and logic of what’s going on.

What We Know
We know Bechard had an affair with someone between late 2015 and late 2017.
We know that Trump’s schedule and Bechard’s Instagram placed him in proximity (NYC) to Bechard in the mid-to-late September 2017 timeframe.

We know a child was conceived around mid-to-late September of 2017 and later aborted.
We know Trump has, at least once, “raw dogged” with a woman he was having and affair with (Stormy Daniels.)
We have photographic evidence on Instagram that Bechard was at least outward ok with being pregnant at some point.
We know Bechard at one point had a dog named Ellie.

We know Bechard at some point was referred to Keith Davidson.
— Davidson was the lawyer who represented two other women who signed NDAs with Trump.
We know Broidy used Michael Cohen, Trump’s personal lawyer and fixer to represent him.

We know Bechard got $1.6 million (hardly Stormy Daniels’ ‘nuisance” money.)
We know Broidy was actively seeking access to the Trump Adminstration about this time in the guise of various Arab states.

We know that the day after the first installment of the $1.6 million to Bechard, Broidy gained access to Trump directly.
We know Bechard is interested in the #MeToo movement.

What We Don’t Know.
Anything to do with Trump directly being connected to Bechard other than Cohen and Davidson.
Anything to do with Broidy being directly connected to Bechard other than the NDA, Davidson and Cohen.
Anything in cold hard fact terms about Bechard’s exact state of mind at the time of the abortion.
— Was there a direct quid pro quo?
Anything about how many Playboy Bunnies (Playboy itself?) knew anything about an affair with either Broidy or Trump.

In fact, we have no evidence that Broidy even knows Bechard other than the things directly connected to the NDA.

Outstanding questions:
How come $1.6 million from Broidy of all people? He’s a rando. Why would he give a shit. Or why would he give $1.6 million worth of shit.
How could Donald J. Trump bang Bechard while also running for president and being in the Oval Office.
How could all of this be kept secret if Trump was the babydaddy? Is that proof that it didn’t happen?
How did the WSJ learn of the affair? Why did Bechard’s name only come out later in the day once the story broke?

Existential Questions
Why no comment from Peter K. Stris, Bechard’s lawyer?
Why no comment from Cooper Hefner?
Will it even matter if we prove it was Trump? Is there nothing that will ever hurt him politically, especially on the character side. He would not have done anything illegal and he can just keep babbling about the “Criminal Deep State” and “Spygate” while liberals burst into flames over the hypocrisy of a otherwise “pro-life” president.

Analysis: The FOTUS Affair Theory In Context Of The Access Hollywood Tape

by Shelton Bumgarner
@bumgarls

Well, a friend of mine has come up with the name “The FOTUS Affair” for this liberal fever dream imbroglio, so that’s what I’m going to start calling it. It’d be hysterical if any of this were true, too bad, as of this moment, it’s not looking like it is.

The point is, let’s look at The FOTUS Affair in the context of The Access Hollywood Tape. If you want to look back at how we got into this situation, it’s that Republicans were so craven by the time the tape came out, that once the shock wore off, they kicked a few rocks and continued their support of Trump. Throw in some Russian collusion and the second Comey Letter and ta-da Trump’s president.

Really, for the FOTUS Affair to hurt Trump, it would have to be a shock to the political system. The proof of the FOTUS Affair would have to come out like a thundercrack out of the blue. If it came out in bits and pieces, then the FOX News Bullshit Machine would easily be able to process it as a poison and move right along.

And don’t forget that there are people who think the Access Hollywood Tape was all a big conspiracy done by the liberal crooked media in an attempt to bring down Trump. So, you would have to have absolute air-tight information that came out of the blue to do Trump any political harm. Sort of hit the vampire with a stake just right or be prepared to be eaten kind of thing.

But would Trump be impeached by the Vichy Republicans in Congress? For what? Being a bad person? Being a hypocrite? If that was a high crime in their eyes — at least when it came to a Republican president, Trump would already be long gone.

So, in the context of the Access Hollywood Tape, there would be, maybe at most a week where, like, fucking normal people would vacillate between laughing at all of this, raging at it, or feeling bad for Shera Bechard. Then by the time the Sunday talkshows rolled around the Conservative talking points would have been thought out and it would all be processed just like the Access Hollywood Tape. Trump might — if he thought he was about to be shamed out of office — make an address saying it was fake news or some other bullshit. But if the proof — I’m looking at you SDNY or maybe The New York Times re: Playboy’s Bunny community — was absolutely airtight with zero wiggle room, the nation might finally have reached a tipping point.

Maybe.

Yet let me stress that this is for the moment a liberal fever dream in the extreme. If there was a liberal version of InfoWars, I would be selling dietary supplements on it right now and screaming, taking off my shirt while I ranted about Instagram proof of the affair.

Let’s get down to the cold hard facts and logic of what’s going on.

What We Know
We know Bechard had an affair with someone between late 2015 and late 2017.
We know that Trump’s schedule and Bechard’s Instagram placed him in proximity (NYC) to Bechard in the mid-to-late September 2017 timeframe.

We know a child was conceived around mid-to-late September of 2017 and later aborted.
We know Trump has, at least once, “raw dogged” with a woman he was having and affair with (Stormy Daniels.)
We have photographic evidence on Instagram that Bechard was at least outward ok with being pregnant at some point.
We know Bechard at one point had a dog named Ellie.

We know Bechard at some point was referred to Keith Davidson.
— Davidson was the lawyer who represented two other women who signed NDAs with Trump.
We know Broidy used Michael Cohen, Trump’s personal lawyer and fixer to represent him.
We know Bechard got $1.6 million (hardly Stormy Daniels’ ‘nuisance” money.)
We know Broidy was actively seeking access to the Trump Adminstration about this time in the guise of various Arab states.
We know that the day after the first installment of the $1.6 million to Bechard, Broidy gained access to Trump directly.
We know Bechard is interested in the #MeToo movement.

What We Don’t Know.
Anything to do with Trump directly being connected to Bechard other than Cohen and Davidson.
Anything to do with Broidy being directly connected to Bechard other than the NDA, Davidson and Cohen.
Anything in cold hard fact terms about Bechard’s exact state of mind at the time of the abortion.
— Was there a direct quid pro quo?
Anything about how many Playboy Bunnies (Playboy itself?) knew anything about an affair with either Broidy or Trump.

In fact, we have no evidence that Broidy even knows Bechard other than the things directly connected to the NDA.

Outstanding questions:
How come $1.6 million from Broidy of all people? He’s a rando. Why would he give a shit. Or why would he give $1.6 million worth of shit.
How could Donald J. Trump bang Bechard while also running for president and being in the Oval Office.
How could all of this be kept secret if Trump was the babydaddy? Is that proof that it didn’t happen?
How did the WSJ learn of the affair? Why did Bechard’s name only come out later in the day once the story broke?

Existential Questions
Why no comment from Peter K. Stris, Bechard’s lawyer?
Why no comment from Cooper Hefner?
Will it even matter if we prove it was Trump? Is there nothing that will ever hurt him politically, especially on the character side. He would not have done anything illegal and he can just keep babbling about the “Criminal Deep State” and “Spygate” while liberals burst into flames over the hypocrisy of a otherwise “pro-life” president.

Reactions To Liberal Fever Dream ‘POTUS Fetus Affair’ If It Were True

by Shelton Bumgarner
@bumgarls

Now, I’m going to be honest. I’m only writing about this at all at this point because I love to write and I’m kind of biding my time while I wait for Trump to pop out of a cake and declare that this is completely all simply a liberal fever dream and I’ve again made a fool out of myself in a very conspicuous manner.

To recap: The POTUS Fetus Theory is between late 2015 and late 2017 Playboy Bunny Shera Bechard had an affair with Donald J. Trump and in mid-to-late September Trump raw dogged her in NYC and got her pregnant. “Somehow” Trump paramour go-to-lawyer Keith Davidson pops up and he and Trump fixer Michael Cohen make this particular problem go away for $1.6 million.

Ok, this could be a liberal fever dream. It could be total bullshit. Complete and total bullshit.

But, dude, I’m bored and I like to write and I’ve managed to come up with yet another angle, so here you go. This time around, it’s how different aspects of society would react to The POTUS Fetus Affair, as I’m calling it.

Liberals
From the moment The POTUS Fetus affair was proven to be real, it would set off a political bombshell of historic proportions. Liberals, already apoplectic at how Trump is rushing us towards a illiberal democracy would explode in a rage at the sheer rank hypocrisy. If you could prove Trump through Cohen had forced a woman to have an abortion for $1.6 million I would like to think it would last more than one news cycle. Maybe? It’d leave a mark, for sure, if nothing else. Or put another way — it would be a go-to liberal talking put at every corner. It would be the thing liberals would rage about on Twitter. The late night talk shows would obsess about the whole thing for weeks, pounding away at the hypocrisy. Colbert alone would probably bring in Jon Stewart for a week to rage at the sheer insanity of it all.

Conservatives
Really, when it comes to conservatives what we’re really talking about is how long and it takes them to process it. If they could come to love Trump after the Access Hollywood Tape issue, they have it all down pat. There would probably be a day or so of them simply being in shock. Depending on how it was proven and if there was a drip-drip-drip or a big roll out of news, they would either process it quickly or they would be in a real pickle. What a liberal like me wants — that they would finally turn their backs on Trump — would be hotly debated for, what, a few minutes? Then that’s it. They would batten down the hatches and pretty much we’d be exactly where we are now, only with polarization and negative polarization being even worse.

Really, Trump’s fate would rest with Evangelicals. If they started talking about how Pence was a “man of God” at this point, then, whoa buddy, something would have changed. But, I’m afraid we’re in the darkest timeline. Trump is a king, and emperor and really at this point the point is who will be his successor and when.

Waiting For Peter K. Stris Comment & Playboy’s Community As Source Material

by Shelton Bumgarner
@bumgarls

The point of me continuing to talk about this is I just want to know one way or another what happened. I want closure. If Elliot Broidy is Bechard’s babydaddy, then I can go back to working on my novel. I just hate this not knowing. I hate the cognitive dissidence of it obviously being Trump on the face of it, and yet there being, like, zero datapoints for it being either Trump or Broidy.

It’s really frustrating.

I would be, at this point, content with a blanket denial from Bechard’s lawyer Peter K. Stris. Just tell me she didn’t bang Trump, doesn’t even know him and I’ll be content. Then we’d have the official statement.

Meanwhile, if I had the resources, I will fly to LA and try to ingratiate myself into the Playboy Bunny community. If I worked for The New York Times I will, like, call Cooper Hefner up directly say, “Bruh, what do you know?” I think if there’s any there there — which there may not be — we could guilt Playboy into fessing up. They have a huge vested interest in being the good guy in this imbroglio. Think of the sudden relevance and positive buzz they would get if they helped bring down Trump — or at least gave him a nasty political bruise? I would be shocked if their corporate self-interests would trump them helping The Resistance. If they did help in any cover up that would be seriously uncool, Playboy.

I guess what I’m saying is if you want to know the truth of this imbroglio, figure out a way to crack the Playboy Bunny community nut. Think of who we’re dealing with. Gorgeous, catty, gossipy young women who share everything and see themselves in a sorority. I would be completely flabbergasted if Bechard had not confided in one of them about who she was seeing, be it Broidy or Trump.

Anyway. I guess I hope we could shame Playboy into confessing whatever they know.

But simply don’t know. It could go either way at this point. It really could.

Trying To Process This Imbroglio Honestly

by Shelton Bumgarner
@bumgarls

I don’t know what to tell you folks.

Logic says Donald Trump is Shera Bechard’s babydaddy, pure and simple. What facts we do have — other than the dog she had named Ellie — point to Donald J. Trump.

And yet.

We simply don’t know _anything_. Nothing. It’s like we’re rushing through a dark field at enormous speed and occasionally we rush past something without any context. It’s comical how one clear datapoint makes it obvious it was Broidy all along. That’s all we need. We need a picture of Broidy with Bechard. Something, anything to tie them together other than the NDA.

I’m honestly stumped. As of right this second, though, it definitely looks like this is all a big misunderstanding and I should just shut up. Until we get some new evidence one way or another, I guess I will continue to vacillate back and forth on who the babydaddy is.

Maybe it’s possible that Bechard really did just “asked around” and got referred to Davidson. Maybe that’s what really happened. And since Cohen and Davidson already had a relationship, it was a natural fit. Doesn’t make any sense at all logically, but I guess if you accept that Broidy was the babydaddy is has some sort of logic to it.

The issue is how thinly sourced the Wall Street Journal story was. They just said, “It happened, trust us.” What makes this different is, as best I can tell, no accomplishing iconic picture of Broidy with Bechard. We got nothing folks. Nothing other than Bechard and Broidy signed the NDA. That’s all we got. Nothing else.

I’m completely unable to process this cognitive dissonance. It’s driving me crazy that logic says one thing and yet what evidence I do have seems to lean towards it being Broidy. Bonkers folks.

I definitely need a stiff drink.

Playboy Seems The Achilles’ Heel Of The Broidy – Bechard Cover Story

by Shelton Bumgarner
@bumgarls

For me, the issue now is simply finding out once and for all if Elliot Broidy was Shera Bechard’s baby daddy. And if I was going to find out, I would attack citadel Playboy. I would start snooping around the Playboy Bunny community, and if I was a well heel NYC reporter, I would ask Cooper Hefner directly for a statement. Yes, no, or kiss my foot, Coop.

It just doesn’t seem possible to me that Bechard could have an affair with either Broidy or Trump without one of her Bunny girlfriends knowing _something_. And as I keep saying, all I want is the truth. If it was Broidy, then fine, I look like an idiot. I’ve been extremely conspicuous being an idiot before and have zero credibility, so it’s not like I’m losing anything.

But I hate how logic is dancing around naked in front of me and I have to be eyes wide shut about it. Logic keeps saying, “That baby’s daddy was Donald Trump!” I’m the first to admit that this is, at this point, a dumb tinfoil hat concept. This is like what a liberal InfoWars would be talking about right now if such a thing existed. Yet like I said, the logic is very powerful.

My gut tells me the Playboy community is the weakspot. Peter K. Stris, Bechard’s lawyer, couldn’t possibly scare the bejeebas out of every woman in the extended Playboy community. Someone, somewhere will squeal if you just ask them what the know.

It’s so frustrating that it seems as though no one in the MSM is very interested in all of this. Or maybe I’m being too impatient. These things take time. But I have to note again — how come Stris has been so mum? Why no statement saying, “Fuck you, she didn’t bang Donald Trump.”

There are several different ways this could go. One way is this remains kind of story that everyone in the media elite knows about but can’t or won’t confirm. It becomes a low-level folktale that die-hard Trump haters babble on about when they get drunk.

Meanwhile, there is the possibility that the story slowly builds to a climax and there’s a tipping point at which the entire country is talking about it and that’s enough pressure to get the MSM to dig really hard and we find the facts out one way or another. The fact that it’s very possible that Broidy is the guy after all, of course, kind of puts a damper on all of this for the mainstream media.

What’s worse, it’s very possible that all of this is for naught. We could learn that Trump really did pay Bechard off to have an abortion and…crickets. We’ll all be talking about Spygate so much that this is just background noise.

This really is a lot like a twisted horror movie at this point.

Idle Mulling A Possible NYC Rendezvous Between Trump & Bechard

by Shelton Bumgarner
@bumgarls

Let me stress that we have definitely ventured into tinfoil hat territory when it comes to the exact circumstances surrounding Shera Bechard’s doomed fetus. So if you’re a Trump supporter and you’re hate reading this, you may want to close your laptop and go for a nice walk instead of read this one. This definitely could be seen as “fake news” given that I’m all but pulling this out of ass.

I’m just speculating. It’s speculation based on damn good logic, but it’s speculation nonetheless. But here goes.

All of this is based on freely available information. How I’m interpreting it where the debate comes in.

So, the issue is — it from what we know that Trump and Bechard were within proximity of each other about the time we believe the later aborted fetus was conceived. They were at least in the city at about the right time. Now, let me be clear — we don’t know were Elliot Broidy was at this time.

Hence it’s very possible this is just bullshit. It’s very possible this argument is cut out of whole cloth. In other words, in hindsight we’ll look back at this as nonsense once we learn one way or another what happened. But it is intriguing. If you add this Instagram from Bechard into the mix, things get really interesting indeed.

She’s in NYC, Trump’s in the area and she’s having a relaxing day in bed.

I honestly don’t know what the truth is. It’s perplexing. What’s so frustrating is the only datapoint that we have that Bechard even knows Broidy is a dog named “Ellie.” But even that could be us overthinking things. There is a lot about Bechard’s connection to Broidy that either we don’t know or makes no sense. We have zero information about how they met or their relationship. We have, in short, no proof that they even know each other other than what we learned about them in the NDA.

Meanwhile, we actually kinda sorta have a link to Trump for Bechard: Keith Davidson and Michael Cohen. Cohen is so close to Trump it’s like saying “John Barron” instead of “Trump.” That’s just odd. As I keep saying, you mean to tell me that the only person Shera Bechard could find to represent her in a NDA agreement settlement was the same dude who had represented two of Trump’s former lovers? And that Broidy just randomly picked Cohen to represent him?

Weird, bruh. Weird.

I again want to note that if I was a bigshot NYC reporter, I would ask Playboy and Cooper Hefner some pointed questions about all of this. They seem like they might be a weak spot in the cover story for no other reason than if it came out that they were complicit in keeping the Broidy cover story going, they might never live it down.
I would ask Hefner if he knew anything about Bechard’s relationship with Broidy. I would see if I could get Playboy’s political reporter to ask around his company as well.

I would also try to figure out which Bunnies Bechard was really close to. Poke around that community a little bit. If they say it was Broidy, then at least we’ll know for sure one way or another. That’s really all I want. I just want the facts. Wherever the facts take me, that’s where I want to go.

I just hate how we don’t know squat about shit right now. We have the Bechard / Broidy WSJ story that makes no sense, while we have some cold hard logic about Trump’s potential connection to Bechard.

Someone, somewhere has go to know SOMETHING. And of those people who know something, one of them has got be a weak link. One of them must know the facts of the matter, regardless of what those facts may be.

My Prediction: The United States Will Be At War With The DPRK By August 2018

by Shelton Bumgarner
@bumgarls

I have predicted this several times in the past, but while we were busy minting coins for the summit, people thought this was uninteresting, but maybe not so much anymore: we will be at work with North Korea by mid-August 2018.

I predict this because Trump lacks basic human empathy and I doubt he would see the loss of 1 million lives in exchange for there being no Blue Wave and he reaching the poll numbers he so craves. So, that’s my logic at least.

We’ll see what happens.

A Deep Dive Into Evidence Trump Was Shera Bechard’s Baby Daddy

by Shelton Bumgarner
@bumgarls

Honestly, my continued interest in this theory is moot. Trump is getting better at the autocrat shtick and any endgame for this investigation in which we “prove” Trump was Shera Bechard’s baby daddy is not going to do what I want it to do: bring down the Trump Administration.

If anything, it will simply make American political life more corrosive than it already is, with libtards like me screaming at the top of our lungs that Trump’s a hypocrite, while his supporters will hunker down for a extended fight whereby the simply want to run out the clock so they can start thinking about 2020, 2024 and ultimately Trump’s successor.

But having said all that, let’s just for fun do another deep dive into the evidence we have that Trump raw dogged Bechard, resulting in her pregnancy that she later terminated.

What started all of this was debate on Reddit that eventually jumped to the pages of New York Magazine. I initially had some confusion over when the affair was supposed to have happened, but when I realized it was 2015-2017, I started to get really interested really fast. This is because it means Trump would have had conceived the fetus with Bechard while he was in office.

Now, let me stress that I am not really doing much of the work. My friend is and I’m just his hype man. But let’s walk through the evidence he has of this and try to rehash some analysis one last time. At least, that is, until something breaks and either makes this prescience, or comical. The evidence my friend found on social media is
extremely tentative, extremely circumstantial evidence that if does not prove the affair at least provides some evidence that it was at least possible.

The above imagine gives us at least some indication that Bechard was floating around NYC during the period of time the affair was alleged to have begun. It allegedly began sometime in mid-to-late 2015 when Trump was making his transition from Right wing celebrity Twitter troll to serious presidential candidate. A little later, Bechard shows up again at a Trump branded property in NYC.

That she was in NYC about this time come very well mean nothing. NYC is a enormous city and just because two people are in proximity to each other, doesn’t mean they’re actually, you know, doing it. And, yet, this is Trump we’re talking about. But here is some more evidence that, if nothing else, at least these two potential love birds were near each other.

This next image is significant because though we don’t know for sure when she was due had she carried the fetus to term, it definitely is about the time she would have needed to have been near Trump for him to be the baby daddy. I suggest you take a look at this image and keep in the back of your mind as events progress. If somehow magically we learn that Trump is the baby daddy, this is one of those datapoints where we will look at each other and go, “Wow!” If it’s Broidy, the, well, meh. We simply whipped ourselves into a frenzy over nothing.

Bechard is Trump’s type — a hot blonde — and so it does give one pause for thought from a logic standpoint. Broidy is a long-time resident of LA and compared to Trump not only a rando, but something of a fat fuck. (I’m not fat shaming him, but it is amusing how hefty Broidy is, even though Trump is not exactly svelte himself.) Take a look at this comparison of women and it definitely seems as though Trump would be digging Bechard if they ever met.

Again, let me stress that one datapoint connecting Bechard to Broidy, and all of this is comical. All of this is moot. So please take this with a grain of salt, at least for now. This could easily fade as quickly as it popped up and I’ll just use this to entertain myself while I’m rotting away inside a Trump-branded concentration camp. So, now is where we enter into some nebulous aspects of this theory in an already nebulous theory to begin with.

So, the above is a datapoint which either is us way, way overthinking things or some insight into her mind. Is this someone upset over a perceived threat to a lover, or just the general outrage that a lot of people felt at the time?

Ok, now we get to a serious issue: what was Shera Bechard’s mindset at the time of the abortion? What the WSJ and their ilk want us to believe is, “You know, broads. Always getting pregnant and then wanting $1.6 million to shut up and go away.” But what if that wasn’t the case at all? What if she was chill to having a baby and only had an abortion as part of a quid pro quo between herself and Trump? Now, it’s my impression that the NDA gives Trump people some wiggle room. But what if there was a spoken agreement between the two parties whereby she HAD to get an abortion to get the $1.6 million? Isn’t that horrible? Wouldn’t that make someone, somewhere — even in Trumplandia — feel unhappy with the man we’ve elected president with the help of a hostile foreign power?

She doesn’t look like she was eager to get an abortion to me. But, MAGA, right? Lulz, nothing matters. So then this happens. She becomes interested in the #MeToo movement. Again, this is wild speculation on my part. It could mean something, it could mean nothing. But it’s at least interesting.

So, did it happen or not? Is Trump the baby daddy or is Broidy. Good question.

Analysis And Conclusion
I honestly have vacillated back and forth on this matter so many times as to lose all credibility when it comes to my opinion. The reason this happens is I keep learning information that makes me believe it’s obviously Broidy. Then I learn information that definitely makes one think the logic of the Trump theory is strong, if nothing else.

One the Broidy side, we don’t have much proof that Bechard even knows him. Or, put another way, we definitely have ZERO evidence that they were lovers in the context of a $1.6 million settlement. We do have this image of her with a dog named “Ellie” which could very well have been given to her by Elliot. But, then again, this could be way too much overthinking this issue.

Meanwhile, on the Trump side, we have logic, logic, logic. First and foremost, we have the surreal situation whereby Keith Davidson — who represented two former lovers of Trump — and Trump’s personal “fixer” Michael Cohen were directly involved in the NDA. Hell, they virtually used the same wording as the one used between Trump and Stormy Daniels as I understand it. I mean, what the what? Of all the shady lawyers in a nation of 335 million they happen to pick two directly connected to Trump? The writers of the 2018 season of the Trump show are hacks. Meanwhile, Broidy wanted — and got — access to Trump about the time the NDA was signed and the money started going to Bechard, as this tweet indicates.

And, of course there’s the fact that while Trump is “big boned” Broidy is just plain old fat. (Not fat shaming, but his girth is amusing.)

But many Bechard likes big guys and all of this speculation will seem comical to say the least once we have some semblance of the “truth.”

So, again, what do I think? Who’s the baby daddy?

I going to punt. I don’t know. Given that Peter K. Stris, Bechard’s current attorney is completely mum on this, I just don’t know. All I want him to do is put out a statement saying it wasn’t Trump and for me to fuck off. It is, however, interesting that he at least knows about me, as indicated by this screenshot.

As I started this off by saying, I’m wasting my time writing about all of this. Trump’s never going down and even if magically we got cold, hard proof he was the baby daddy, we’re so divided as a nation it won’t matter. I would like to think that all of this is the run-up to a national debate and investigation of this matter, but I could be fooling myself. It could be that this is just going to fade in the early summer sun. I just want to know one way or another.

Logic says it’s Trump, but stranger things have happened. It could very well be Broidy and we can all go back to cursing the bread and worrying about Mexican children being put in concentration camps. May God have mercy on our souls.

Shelton Bumgarner is a writer and photographer living in Richmond, Va. He may be reached at migukin (at) gmail (dot) com. He has lots of interests including writing song lyrics and daydreaming about a social media startup based on the concepts of Usenet. He is writing his first novel.